Can We Use Carbon 14 Dating On Dinosaur Bones
Instead, other methods are used to work out a fossil's age. These include radiometric dating of volcanic layers above or below the fossils or by. Why is there Carbon 14 in Dinosaur bones? Is it a problem with radiometric dating that carbon 14 is found in materials dated to millions of. earth's history, carbon dating,anomolies,origins, dinosaurs,fossils,dinosaur bone dating.
They have even refused to publish our findings in America. Our team published a paper in Scientific article on dating dinosaur bones in Germany and in the National Research Council of Italy in Scientists have discovered a very large asteroid impact site in Antarctica.
As little as years ago mainstream English speaking scientist did not believe that stones fell from the sky contrary to all the anecdotal evidence over the past centuries. Asteroids are usually referred to as being a solid rock from outer space whereas comets are usually a mixture of ice and rock and typically burn up before hitting the earth. In a large something from outer space destroyed thousands of acres of forest in Tunguska.
Scientist for the last hundred years have been searching for a crator or remnants of space rock. Finally in scientist think they have found an impact site at the bottom of a nearby lake Cheko.
Whats at the bottom might be shattered rocks or impact melt or maybe a piece of meteorite. National Geographic reports that scientist Dallas Abbott from Columbia University has been gathering data and announcing for the past ten years that a giant tsunami deposited ocean floor sediment on Madigascar. The sediments cover an area 2 times the size of Manhattan and are over feet tall. Somewhere in the Indian ocean is thought to be where the giant asteroid struck that produced this giant wave.
More shocking is the fact that the microfossils in this sediment were dated to less than 7, years ago. The really disturbing conclusion is that civilization destroying bolides such as these have happened not millions of years ago but thousands of years ago.
We agree with Dallas Abbott that dangerous meteors have struck the earth in recent times and that the governments of the world should be aware of this fact. In northern Arizona is a large Meteor Crater, the Barringer Crater, Its well preserved shape suggests a very recent origin. During the last years numerous attempts have been made to determine when this event happened. The age of this event has varied from years ago toyears ago.
It all depends on what age determination method is used and what assumptions are made using the method. The Hopi Indians who live in that area have legends about the meteor's impact. Since they would have been living in the area at the time to have observed and passed on a tradition of the event for posterity, that would limit the impact to less than 10, years ago.
It is thought by some to have been the cause of the death of the dinosaurs. Since that is the case if in fact these dinosaurs died as a result of the asteroid hit at Chicxulub then the asteroid hit also only thousands of years ago! Numerous unpetrified dinosuar bones found in Mesozoic strata have been dated and average 31, radio carbon years old. The Mesozoic strata was laid down at the same time as the dinosaur bones and are the same age.
Dating dinosaurs and other fossils - Australian Museum
This strata contains hundreds of asteroids which have been identified thus far. Now that we know the strata they struck is tens of thousands of years old and not millions of years old, we can see that asteroids arrive at a rate around times higher than previously projected. Its arrival was caught on video. The impact was calculated as the equivalent of a blast oftons of TNT.
It shattered windows and damaged over 3, buildings and injured people. It could have been a lot worse of course. It points out the imminent danger of another large meteorite or asteroid from outer space wiping out possibly whole civilizations. An Asteroid labled tc-4 will supposedly miss the earth by miles on October 12,13 of That is terribly close. If that asteroid hit earth the damage would depend on several factors: Consider an asteroid YU55 which came near the earth in If it had struck in the ocean a sunami 60 feet high might have been generated.
It is estimated that first degree burns from the fireball would have afflicted people within 60 miles. Could these asteroids have caused the earth to crack and continents to move?
What caused the continents to separate and created many of the mountain ranges of the world. Slowly drifting continents have been the usual explanation for the past 50 years and is generally referred to as Plate Tectonics Theory.
That idea was proposed in but was not accepted by the scientific community until 50 years later. Now another theory has been proposed to better explain the events. It is called Shock Dynamics and can explain all those events better.
It says that an exceptionally large asteroid split the single continent and moved its pieces to where we see them today. See reference 3 below for a thorough explanation. The few centimeters of motion in the plates measured now is due to a difference in how fast the outer lithosphere rotates versus the inner mantle, a mechanism proposed for Plate Tectonis by mainstream geologists years ago.
New information found in Laetoli Tanzania. Like the footprints found inthey are in the same layer of volcanic ash near the surface that would likely have hardened a few hours after it fell. But the one who made these footprints, labled S-1, was larger than individuals who made the footprints. Possibly a male he is estimated to have stood 5 foot 5 inches high comparable to many modern humans.
If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck maybe it is a duck Yet the footprints are supposedly 3 million years old. Just as forensic accountants can often determine when a criminal business has cooked its books merely by doing a Benford statistical analysis of the numbers, so too mathematicians have demonstrated that statistical analysis can indicate whether scientific data is likely a result of measurement errors. So evolutionists typically claim that all this 14c results from contamination, but statistical analysis indicates that when plotting erroneous dates as from contaminationthe data should fit a normal curve.
However, it does not. Regarding the results from the ten dinosaurs dated as aboveof course, bacteria do not make collagen. And if the 14c came from contamination, for example, one would not expect the contamination to so equally affect the bioapatite and the collagen.Dinosaur Soft Tissue -Hear Evolusionist Refuse To Carbon Date Dinosaur
The above paper indicates that where sampled, the ground area has decreasing 14c with distance from the dinosaur bone, indicating that modern carbon is leaching out of the bone which is not problematicbut, most significantly, not seeping into the bone. Dinosaur bone showing 5pmc means that five percent of the carbon in the bone needs to be replaced with modern carbon, which high level of contamination would very possibly be detectable.
Dinosaur bone showing 5pmc means that, because the 14c half-life is so brief, 5, years, if the radiocarbon is from contamination that occurred 6, years ago, a full five percent, i.
See below, 42 minutes into Paul Giem's presentation. Thus, where researchers find both soft tissue and 14c, especially in small bones as with the mosasaurthe claim that the biological tissue is dinosaurian and is not contamination works exactly against the claim that the 14c is from contamination. The inventor of the radiocarbon dating method, Dr. Walter Libby, stated in the journal Science, "There is no known natural mechanism by which collagen may be altered to yield a false age.
Here's our RSR explanation of why this is. Because new carbon atoms will not replace original carbon atoms in the collagen molecule. As a result of decomposition, to the extent that original carbon atoms were falling out of the tissue so to speakthen to that extent you would no longer have collagen; rather, to that extent you would have humic acid. Decomposing collagen cannot be "repaired" by free carbon atoms happening upon the decomposition.
Rather, the collagen must be manufactured within a living animal with its constituent carbon atoms into a " super-super-coil In addition to work already done documenting appreciable 14c levels even in contamination-resistant specimens, we recommend a few experiments including a couple proposed by RSR friend David Willis: The young earth model predicts the finding of significant quantities of carbon 14 throughout the bone.
The evolutionary model would predict no modern carbon in such a bone, but as a secondary assumption, if 14c is found, since any contaminating material would have to pass through the outer layers of the bone to get into the center, the contamination explanation would expect to measure generally decreasing percentages of 14c from the outside to the center of each individual bone.
A second experiment, beginning as above, would be to date a small diameter bone and a larger diameter bone from the same dinosaur.
Getting the same dates would help rule out contamination because the smaller bone will have a larger surface to volume ratio which, if contamination were a significant factor, should result in higher percentages of modern carbon. A third experiment that could falsify contamination as a possible source of 14c involves: With the announcement that these reserves in Siberia contain diamonds that are "twice as hard as normal", these will be ideal for 14c dating because their natural hardness would further rule out contamination.
Also, evolutionary geologists claim that these diamonds were already ancient when, allegedly 35 million years ago, a meteor impacted above them.
The evolutionary model predicts no carbon dead 14c. The young earth model predicts significant quantities of 14c measurable throughout the diamond. A fourth experiment that could falsify contamination as a possible source of 14c involves radiocarbon dating of allegedly million-year-old amber, by selecting pristine specimens, the condition of which may also help to rule out contamination.
At the 7th ICC Dr. Dating bones in situ, and dating their surrounding matrix, will elimate various sources of possible contamination and provide significant additional data.
Published by RSR on Aug. Consider then, the fossil remains of organisms that had lived near the surface but that have been long buried in ocean sediments. If neutron capture were responsible for much of the unexpected 14c, then collectively, such ocean specimens, collectively, should have far less 14c than specimens excavated on the continents. Further, more analysis should be done on relevant specimens excavated from uranium minescomparing their radiocarbon percentages to similar in type and estimated date specimens gathered away from uranium mines.
Thus, marine deposit specimens and uranium mine specimens can function as control groups.
Regardless though, for an uncontaminated specimen like diamonds, pure collagen, dinosaur soft tissue, etc. Out of every trillion Carbon atoms in the atmosphere, only about one is 14c.
Further, significant unknowns, both in the rates of 14c production in the atmosphere, and in the Earth's enormous geologic upheaval in the past, could have altered the 1,,to-1 ratio. Henry Richterthe NASA scientist who launched our first satellite, oversaw development of the scientific equipment used on the first lunar missions, and who played an important role in the early discovery of the Van Allen radiation belt.
By the way, Dr. Though it may be an extremely negligible source, of the various emissions from radioactive decay alpha particles, beta particles, etc. If you know of a web page where this is described, please email that link to Bob kgov. Also, as only widely recognized inlightning can produce 14c.
We have a young earth! Long-term, authoritative, and worldwide measurements show that the Earth's magnetic field is decaying rapidly as NASA's data shows is also true of Mercury. Our planet's more powerful magnetic field in the past better shielded Earth from cosmic rays, resulting in less Carbon production.
This means that carbon ages of specimens from past millennia and even from only centuries ago need to be adjusted downward. So apart from adjustment for the exponentially decaying magnetic field, specimens are therefore younger than their radiocarbon age indicates. For, living with a stronger field, plants and animals absorbed less radiocarbon.